Monday, March 26, 2007

post 22, INTEGRITY taking shape

INTEGRITY taking shape, 1981. See also posts 03 ,09, and 17. You can see that the top two strakes are a lighter color then the original mahogany hull of the old lifeboat. Rot had crept down from the cobbled up plywood deck and cabin some fisherman had added, so I had to replace those two top strakes. In the process I had to sister up the ribs, of course, so I did a strong job of sistering and just ran the ribs right up to the top of the new cabin I was putting on. My sistered ribs were good air-dried oak because they had to be strong, but all my added planking was kiln dried doug fir. Doug fir is a respectable boat lumber, but kiln drying takes the life out of any wood. But you have to live with what you can obtain. Good boat lumber is terribly expensive. It didn't make sense to spend a fortune (which I didn't have anyway) for rebuilding such an old boat.

To compensate some for any weakness of the kiln dried planking, I kept my design very strong. The decks were flush with no weakening cockpit that might turn into a bathtub. This proved to be a godsend. In mid-Pacific with an exceptional wind from astern, three times in one day we had ankle deep green water washing over the entire after deck. This didn't bother us in the slightest. We weren't even apprehensive. But it might have been serious if we had had a cockpit there to fill to the brim with water and make us top heavy.

Also, the cabin design, rising right up from the sides on the sistered ribs (and no windows), was strong. We were caught one time on the treacherous Columbia River Bar, "The Graveyard of the Pacific", with breakers flush with the very top of the cabin pounding our beam. The sturdy boat lived up to her name.

I was not an experienced boat builder. The only previous boat carpentry work I had done at that time was messing with old 22 foot SCHOOLMARM during the couple of months just before obtaining INTEGRITY. But I did dig up whatever books I could find, and I went on a crash-learning course. If you want the memories when you're old, you've got to "just do it" when you're young enough to.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

post 21, Jumping Fences

Fence jumping, 1988. See also posts 01, 03, 06, 10 and 16. When I worked with the untrained burros before the trek I realized that Oregon's High Desert was crisscrossed by BLM fences and that gates might be ten miles apart. The wires are always under high tension. If you cut one you would need a wire stretcher and spare wire to repair it. Even if you had good intentions to repair, you would make instant enemies of the ranchers if you cut a fence wire. So I spent some time and effort training the burros to jump fences before I started the trip.

Of course, there's a limit to how high a little burro can jump. I carried an all-purpose fencing tool with me. They're combination pliers, wire cutter, hammer and staple puller. When I came to a fence, I would undo the wire from maybe six posts. Then I would push the wires down and tie them in a bundle as low as I good get them. I would wrap a saddle blanket around the bundle for insurance and then the burros would jump over the wires. Since they had been taught this trick during their initial training, they did it willingly, with no hassle. After crossing the fence I would re-position the wires at their normal height. The fence had not been damaged in the least.

I apologize for not remembering the name of the young lady in the photo. A friend had driven the three burros and me to the third annual Glass Buttes Knap-In, which is held during Easter Spring Break each year. When the gang learned that I was going to head off on a compass course for the little hamlet of French Glenn after the Knap-In, this girl asked if she could join me to learn a little about trekking with burros. Of course, I agreed. She was a good camper and we had a great trip. We only had one area of disagreement, and I'll discuss that in a later post.

Monday, March 12, 2007

post 20, Working Sinew

Working sinew during the Columbia River canoe trip, 1987. See also posts 01, 04, 07 and 13. In post 13 I showed a quicky bow and arrow and one of the fish obtained with them. There is a hierarchy of Stone Age weapons or tools for obtaining game progressing from the club to spear to atlatyl to bow and arrow.

A club is the least effective, but it's the easiest to acquire. I've killed porcupines with clubs (actually, a club is the best weapon for porcupines--I'll elaborate on that in another post).

A spear is the next easiest to obtain. I've just read a news account of chimpanzees making crude spears and getting bush babies with them. I also used a spear and I did catch fish with it, but it was a short-range weapon, and I found it quite difficult to stalk the fish and get close enough to use it.

An atlatyl is a stick used as kind of an arm extension for throwing spears a greater distance. Inuit (Eskimos) and Australian aborigines used atlatyls until fairly recently. But I can't imagine anyone preferring the short range atlatyl if they had the proper materials and knowledge for making the longer range bows and arrows. Inuit had the knowledge for making bows but they seldom had suitable wood in the far north.

Just having the knowledge of how to make something does you no good if you don't also have suitable materials. The usual obstacle to quickly making an effective bow in a survival situation is the lack of a suitable bowstring. Vegetable fibers, such as from nettle, may be available in the local area--but only at certain times of the year. There is commonly a processing procedure that takes time. Also, most vegetable fibers available quickly in the wilderness just aren't strong enough.

The best natural bowstring material that I have found, it's just as effective as the synthetic polyester, is sinew. But here again, you're not going to find any ready to use and just laying around out in the wilderness. When you do kill a large animal, or come across the carcass of one recently killed by a cougar or such, you must cut out the sinew and carefully hoard it for future use. (And the rawhide as well.)

Sinew is tendon. The thickest pieces of tendon come from the lower leg, and you want to extract that tendon in pieces as long as possible. The muscle on a deer's back is covered with a thin shiny sheet of the same material, and you also save this in pieces as long as possible, but this back tendon is too valuable for splitting into sewing thread to use for most other things.

After acquiring from a carcass, the leg sinew must be dried thoroughly, and of course, that takes a little time. In the photo above, a piece of dried leg sinew is shown on the right. Then you lay the dry sinew on a solid log--or a big smooth rock--and you take a husky club and beat on it. You have to really put some muscle into this. Sinew is tough.

When the thick piece of sinew is pretty well squashed, you use your thumbnails to pull long fibers off of it. Those soft fibers will typically have a hard lump right at the end where the sinew was originally cut. Those lumps must be pulled off with your thumbnail. If you can't pull them off, your fiber is too thick and it must be separated into finer pieces. Each fiber should taper to nothing at each end.

Commercial cordage and rope is typically composed of three strands twisted together. That makes for nice round rope, but it's difficult to do in the woods. Aborigines settled for two strands. To start, you take six or seven of the sinew fibers (pictured on the left side of the photo) and at the center of the fibers you twist them tightly together for a couple of inches. Looking from either end, the twist should be clockwise. (Reverse all these directions if you're left handed.) Then you fold the ends toward each other. The twisted center part tries to untwist and it locks itself into the start of a two-strand cord with the two strands twisted together counterclockwise. What holds the cord together is the counterclockwise strands fighting the clockwise fibers.

To make your embryonic cord longer, you add fibers to each strand. You hold the point where the two strands merge to become a cord between the thumb and forefinger of your left hand. You take the fibers of one strand between the thumb and forefinger of your right hand and twist the fibers clockwise. At the same time, you pull that twisted strand over the other strand in a counterclockwise direction and snug it under your thumb to hold it twisted. You just keep doing that until you have a nice long bowstring as is pictured at the center of the photo.

Aborigines made a lot of cordage for various uses and they often laid the fibers of both strands on their thigh and twisted them simultaneously by rolling them against their thigh with the palm of their hand. The twisted fibers then automatically twisted the strands together. For a bowstring I think it's stronger to twist with the fingers.

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

post 19, Designing COMPROMISE

Designing COMPROMISE, 1991. See also posts 01, 02, 05, and 11. You can see that the setting is ideal. Essentially the whole back wall of the room is glass with a wonderful panoramic view of the mouth of the Columbia in front of Astoria, Oregon. Thru the middle pane you can see a freighter steaming upriver toward Portland. There was always a steady stream of boats of all types to watch and dream about.

I have occasionally lived in fancy houses, but none of them were mine. At the time pictured, my own home was a dilapidated big work van, like a bread truck, with a sheet of plywood for a bed and a tiny one burner propane hotplate for a cook stove. The house in the picture was the getaway house of Bob and Dorothy Miles. Their normal residence was a condominium in Portland. Bob had bought an old church high on a hill in Astoria. He then tore out almost the complete back of the church and replaced it with glass doors and windows, and he then remodeled the church into a modern house.

In posts 07 and 14 I told about my good friend Joe Pindell. Bob Miles was a mutual friend of Joe and I. Like Joe, Bob didn't actually do anything with boats--he just dreamed about them. When he first bought the old church he had vague thoughts about building a boat in it. In the photo you can see the telescope he set up for watching boat traffic. On the second floor he built into the church there was a drafting table with the same wonderful view of the river. I drew up my plans at the drafting table with many referrals to the library of boat books in the shelf at my elbow.

I rebuilt the balcony just outside the window for Bob. At the back of the building on the steep hillside the balcony was about 20 feet off of the ground and there was rot in the supporting structure. I also did some roof work on the old building. In exchange, Bob and Dorothy let me house-sit the place and do my design work on COMPROMISE. But it wasn't a business relationship. They were just great friends helping a fellow dreamer achieve his dreams.

post 10

Tar Baby and Charlie Brown taking a rest, 1988. Tar Baby has the black muzzle, possible because of his inbred status. They are not confined in any way--and we're in the middle of nowhere in the southeast corner of Oregon's High Desert. If your wellbeing is dependent on others, animals or people, it is wise to have a good relationship with those others--and to understand the limits of that relationship.

Gentle Ben, the oldest of the three brothers, is not in the photo--and he does have a rope on him. Whenever Ben was not confined he would methodically start walking toward "home" with his two siblings trailing right behind. Where Ben considered home was diagonally clear across the state in the northwest corner. The one time Ben got loose I had to track them for a couple of miles before I caught up with them. But they were not trying to escape from me. If they had been I never could have caught them.

As you can see in the photo, grass is scarce in the desert, and it's a very big advantage if you can let your animals roam free to find their own. Then to catch them again, it helps if you have a little treat to give them. I like to have everything I carry serve multiple purposes. Instead of carrying oats for the burros, I just carried flour for making ash bread that both the burros and I liked.

To make ash bread, you open your flour sack and make a little depression, like a cup, in the flour. You pour a little water in that depression and then stir the water and adjacent flour into a thick dough. You then work that dough (coating it with dry flour if it's sticky) into a disc maybe a quarter of an inch thick and four or five inches in diameter. You scrape the burning wood of your campfire to one side and lay the disc on the hot ashes where the fire just was. You then scrape some more hot ashes, with a few live coals, onto the top of the disc. If you started with a small "Indian" fire, like I often use, you may want to repeat the cooking procedure, moving the burning wood again and turning the disc over in the process.

The only ingredients are flour and water. You do not add any grease or shortening. That would make dirt stick to the bread. The dry bread is remarkable clean after cooking and shaking the ashes off. A few ashes won't hurt you at all. The bread is kind of a hard cracker, but it's good and it keeps forever.

If you don't have store-bought flour several starchy food plants of the wilderness can be dried thoroughly and pounded with rocks as mortar and pestle into suitable flour. Experiment to minimize adding rock dust to the flour. Biscuitroot was the most available and suitable plant in the High Desert, but the starchy root is only easy to find during the few wet weeks in early spring when carrot type leaves and yellow umbel flowers reveal its location. The rest of the year you have to have sharp eyes and hunt for the tiny and inconspicuous withered seed stalk which will be the only visible remnant of the plant. (Caution--some relatives of this plant are deadly poisonous.)

The ash bread did not form a significant amount of the burro's food at all. I just gave them a little bite, maybe an inch square, and not every day. But that bite made them feel that I loved them--and I did. And I never had any trouble walking right up to them, wherever they were, and putting their halters on.

-----------------------------

Installment ten of:

IN OPPOSITION TO CIVILIZATION

by Andy Van't Hul

When examined from a species extinction point of view, the invention of gunpowder was certainly one of the most damaging and dreadful innovations ever conceived of. The very first time an application of fire caused a mix of chemicals to explode forcefully, the experimenter should have instantly received a sustained shock from a cattle prod to let him know that he had committed a boo-boo and he'd better not play with that stuff anymore. But instead, the exact opposite happened. His buddies all crowded around in fascination at the feat and begged for the recipe. Instead of being punished for the great crime of causing the future extinction of many species, the inventor received a massive pleasure hit of happybrain that most certainly encouraged him to try to invent ever more powerful explosive mixtures.

First, we decimated all of our prey species with our hi-tech weapons. Even Stone Age bows and arrows exterminated many species. Then we switched to farming with the clear cutting of vast forests and the building of huge dams that disrupted river ecologies. Our agriculture system is a total disaster now with extreme soil erosion, trace element deletion, chemical poisoning, desertification etc. I could write another thick book just on that subject. In order to really comprehend how seriously in trouble civilized humans are today, it is important to realize the damage agriculture has caused and is continuing to cause every day to the total life support capacity of earth.

In my analogy comparing Earth Entity to a human body I say that humans are wildly proliferating cancer cells sickening EE. A cancer in a human body does not cause damage only by the sheer number of cancer cells. The cancer also causes tissue breakdown and toxins to develop. Agriculture, the cancer affecting EE, is massively doing the same thing to EE, to Mother Nature.

The erosion of topsoil is obvious and atrocious, but the trace element deletion may be just as bad, and it is not visible--until you see the end effects such as the mindless cretins and the women with huge goiters on their necks. Those symptoms, common in China and the Philippines, are the result of farming-caused iodine deficiency in the soil. Crops suck trace elements out of the soil, and those trace elements, locked in the grain kernels or etc. are then shipped great distances to a city or an animal feedlot where the grain is fed to a hog or a person. Nearly all of those transported trace elements end up in feces which then never leave the locality of that city or feedlot. Those trace elements are no longer available to the food chain--but they are tremendously important for good health--and they took literally millions of years to accumulate, by gradual decomposition of minerals, in the soil. Back during the millions of years we lived as hunter-gatherers we never displaced those trace elements. They were always carefully hoarded by Mother Nature and recycled from life to life right in their original locality. We have no way of measuring the damage we are now doing to the soil, to flowerpot earth, with agriculture--we just know that it is immense. In previous writings I have spent some space and time on the damage agriculture is causing to the environment--but like I said above, the subject is so extensive that it demands its own book, or several volumes, and those books are already published and available in any extensive library. To keep this essay from becoming too rambling I will not try to reproduce the bulk of that material here.

To be continued.

This is a work in progress.

Comments are welcome

(but they may not be posted or replied to immediately)