Monday, April 23, 2007

post 26, Coyote in trap

Coyote in a trap, 1988. See also, posts 01, 03, 06, 10, 16, and 21. The location is at a waterhole on Oregon's High Desert. Some ranchers just set traps and then forget them for long periods--partly because distances are so great. There probably isn't a ranch, or anything else, within 30 miles of this waterhole. But all ranchers are not that way. Some of them release coyotes they find in traps just like I did.

When I walked up to the coyote, his eyes were flashing fire, his teeth were bared, and he was tensed and ready to fight to the death. I told him, "I'm not going to hurt you". The fire went out of his eyes and his body went limp. With my bare hands just inches from his mouth I took off the trap. It must have hurt, but he stoically remained calm. With the trap off, he walked a few yards away and then turned to say thank you. His leg was not badly damaged. I'm sure he recovered okay.

Monday, April 16, 2007

post 25, Testing COMPROMISE

Testing COMPROMISE, 1992. See also posts 01, 02, 05, 11 and 19. A new boat design never gets enough testing. If you tried to do a really adequate job you would spend your life playing with toy boats and never make one full size.

I didn't have any radio control apparatus for guiding the model so I just used a fishing rod and spinning reel to reel it back in after each run. That was more positive anyway. COMPROMISE was designed for extreme shoal draft river gunk holing and only occasional ocean use--primarily for changing rivers. Speed and efficiency at sailing was not really a consideration as long as she was capable of sailing. Her only engine was a ten-horse Seagull outboard. But even occasional ocean use meant she had to be able to take it--whatever "it" happened to be. The most unpleasant sailing I've ever encountered (with INTEGRITY) was just off the mouth of the Columbia River, still in view of land.

Primary causes of loss of life on the oceans are boats that turn upside down (capsize) or sink. For me, that situation is ridiculous, at least for "pleasure boats". There is nothing pleasurable involved with capsizing or sinking and without too much trouble a boat can be designed that cannot capsize or sink.

To make sure that a boat cannot possibly sink you only have to ensure that the sum of its materials has positive buoyancy. Reduce the heavy metal in the boat to the bare minimum and make sure there's a lot of light material like light wood or Styrofoam to compensate for the metal. Then to make sure the boat cannot possibly capsize, you put the light stuff on top and the heavy stuff down low. The principles are so simple and fool proof and the contemplation of drowning is so distasteful that I feel boat designers are insane to not give this matter careful consideration.

But everyone focuses on speed or comforts and conveniences, and no one imagines that their boat will ever encounter any difficulties.
The bottom of COMPROMISE was flat four-inch thick solid doug fir to withstand beaching on unknown shores. Her sides were two-inch thick spruce, a very light wood. Her large cabin top was six inch thick Styrofoam sandwiched between three-eighths inch plywood.

The heaviest permanently installed member of COMPROMISE was her diesel burning stove. She did have five anchors--you always want plenty of anchors--and there was a little anchor chain and the Seagull outboard, but the anchors, chain and outboard could have been heaved overboard in just a minute or two if that became necessary. Anchors and their chain must always be stored where they can be reached instantly.

A sailboat needs weight down low to stand up to her sail. COMPROMISE, like INTEGRITY before her, carried her ballast in about 30 five-gallon jugs, most of which held drinking water. They were all securely lashed to the very bottom of the boat. The water was heavy enough to hold the sail up to the wind, but if the boat were badly holed the water jugs, being of neutral buoyancy, would not try to sink the boat. In fact, they could be rapidly re-filled with air to ensure that the crippled boat would still ride high in the water.

Monday, April 9, 2007

post 24. Mustang

A mustang being broke to ride, 1988. See also posts 12 and 18. The wooden saddle on Maude is the one I showed being built in post 18. It looked a little odd but it functioned beautifully.

Maude was a six year old mare, mature and set in her wild ways, and she was not easy to work with. With her tied in the corral I got her to accept the saddle, and me sitting in the saddle, but when I tried working around her head she just went berserk. That isn't normal, but horses get peculiar phobias just like people do. I was afraid she might do serious damage to herself.

When you're breaking horses you want the job to keep progressing smoothly and fairly rapidly. If you get hung up on some aspect of it you may quickly do more damage then good with the horse getting the idea that they are in control.

Inventions don't just pop out of the blue. Our brain is a computer, and like any computer it can't manufacture coherent data from a vacuum. It can only process data that it newly acquires or that it holds in memory. Inventions come from observations or remembered observations.
While focused intently on this headstrong horse with a head phobia, I suddenly recalled working with a quite wild little welsh-arab filly 20 years earlier. At that time I was sincerely trying to blend into civilization. I had a full time job as Instrument Man at the U. of Idaho Physics Dept. and I was also trying to moonlight and start my own hog farm, which was a full time job. I had no time for messing with untrained equines. But when this beautiful little chocolate brown two-year-old filly pranced into the ring at the livestock auction, and it looked like she was being sold for pet food, I couldn't let that happen. I had to rescue her.

When I brought her home in the stock truck, I had to do something with her immediately because I had other pressing work to do. She had never been worked with at all before and she was as wild as a ranch-raised horse can be. I had gotten a halter and rope on her at the sale yard with the help of the crew and the chute facilities there, but I didn't dare take the rope off or I would never catch her again.

In the process of cobbling up a haywire hog set-up, I had acquired several old pea boxes. These were about four by six by three feet high and had once been made to each hold a ton of dry peas in a pea warehouse. I didn't have time to analyze the situation. I just tied the end of the filly's rope to a corner of a pea box and opened the tailgate of the truck to let her jump out. She hit the ground running and jerked the box for a yard or two when she hit the end of the rope. She fought frantically for ten minutes or so, but the box would always slide a few feet to cushion her frantic jerks and she wasn't hurting herself. The box was too heavy for her to drag very far when she was tied by the head and she soon gave up.

Sometime later I was walking past the filly doing my hog chores, and I realized that I had to do something with her. Without thinking much about what to do, I worked her up close with her chin touching the box and tied the rope like that. Then I climbed right in the box and walked right up to the filly's head. Of course she jerked around, but the box always gave a little with her jerks, so she didn't hurt herself. And she couldn't jerk away from me because I came with the box. In ten minutes she tired out and was eating hay out of my hand. (That isn't a sign of being tame. It's a nervous, compulsive, reaction all horses will do when they give up.)

When I was struggling to cope with Maude, my brain brought that memory out of long-term storage, and I knew it was the answer. I asked the ranch manager if I could build a horse-training sled out of some old three-quarter inch plywood and junk lumber I saw stacked up. He readily agreed because they also worked with horses regularly. If I remember right, the sled in the photo is about four by six by almost four feet from the ground to the top. It's built hell for stout with steel strap reinforcing at the corners and it's heavy so a wild horse can't just rip it apart. The box is on sled runners so it could be used for training draft horses to pull. The back of the box has a wide V notch so a guy can get in or out easily.

The training sled worked beautifully. After a half hour I could do anything I wanted to Maude's head and she docilely accepted it. In later posts I'll show photos of the sled with other wild mustangs being trained. The construction of the sled doesn't quite fit my Stone Age hunter-gatherer goal, but I count it as being one of my most practical inventions.

Monday, April 2, 2007

post 23, Playing Stone Age Aborigine

Playing Stone Age aborigine in the mountains of northeast Oregon, cutting a potential sarviceberry bow stave, 1976. See also posts 05, 13, 15 and 20. The axe head was tough dense basalt flaked to shape. An axe head ground smooth would last much longer before chipping to a worthless dull edge, but the grinding--with natural materials--took much too long to seem practical. At least when you needed an axe for a job you wanted to do right now, it made more sense to just flake a new head when necessary. Maybe the indigenous natives who did have ground axe heads (for status symbols?) had slaves to do the grinding. A modern commercial Carborundum sharpening stone could do the grinding in a reasonable time--even on the basalt--but that sort of flagrant cheating did not fit the spirit of the endeavor.

The axe handle was good hardwood with a natural intertwined grain around the axe head. I remember that it took me a full day, working with only stone tools, to make the hole in the handle for the head. A beaver tooth embedded in a wood handle for use as a gouge or chisel might have done the job much faster--but I didn't have a beaver tooth right then.

I have had a full and interesting life, with funky boats, wild horses and primitive wilderness camping, but I have never consciously sought thrills. I especially have never intentionally put myself in a dangerous position. I think that would be the height of stupidity. I have always carefully tried to foresee and prepare for any eventuality.

I didn't live the way I did because I wanted to have adventures. I did it because I thought it was the right thing to do. Ever since I was a child, snaring woodchucks in the farm woodlot, I have felt that a simple, primitive, life, as a part and parcel of nature, was the way that a person should live. At first it was purely intuitive, but as I gained more experience and insight it became a compelling philosophy. I am now convinced that it is the only moral and ethical way to live. Civilization destroys Nature whenever it touches it. We humans are Civilization, but we are also Nature. We are committing mass species destruction, of our own as well as of a great many others, with all our civilized "comforts and conveniences". I have no objection to a person killing themself, such as with cigarettes or alcohol, if that's what their personal priorities lead them to do, but the mass destruction of species, species who comprise the very structure of the living environment that we and most others depend on for our daily existence, cannot be justified by any argument.

But I am also fully aware that the only meaningful lifetime goal for any individual of any species is to reproduce their genes. Unfortunately, at the present time a man faces a big conflict between that all-important primary goal and a lifestyle as an integral symbiotic constituent of Nature. During my entire life I have never found a spouse who shared my desire to live as close to nature as possible. Because I could find no way to solve this enigma, my life has been continual compromise--one foot free in the wilderness of mountain, desert or ocean and the other foot trapped in the quagmire of civilization.

Today I find myself in the ludicrous position of sitting at a modern hi tech computer and typing an advocacy of returning to a hand-to-mouth hunter-gatherer existence. But this betrayal of principles has allowed me to father and help raise a seven-year old son who shows as much potential as any 75 year old father could hope for.

Let them scribe upon my gravestone, "He lived life the best he could".

post 10

Tar Baby and Charlie Brown taking a rest, 1988. Tar Baby has the black muzzle, possible because of his inbred status. They are not confined in any way--and we're in the middle of nowhere in the southeast corner of Oregon's High Desert. If your wellbeing is dependent on others, animals or people, it is wise to have a good relationship with those others--and to understand the limits of that relationship.

Gentle Ben, the oldest of the three brothers, is not in the photo--and he does have a rope on him. Whenever Ben was not confined he would methodically start walking toward "home" with his two siblings trailing right behind. Where Ben considered home was diagonally clear across the state in the northwest corner. The one time Ben got loose I had to track them for a couple of miles before I caught up with them. But they were not trying to escape from me. If they had been I never could have caught them.

As you can see in the photo, grass is scarce in the desert, and it's a very big advantage if you can let your animals roam free to find their own. Then to catch them again, it helps if you have a little treat to give them. I like to have everything I carry serve multiple purposes. Instead of carrying oats for the burros, I just carried flour for making ash bread that both the burros and I liked.

To make ash bread, you open your flour sack and make a little depression, like a cup, in the flour. You pour a little water in that depression and then stir the water and adjacent flour into a thick dough. You then work that dough (coating it with dry flour if it's sticky) into a disc maybe a quarter of an inch thick and four or five inches in diameter. You scrape the burning wood of your campfire to one side and lay the disc on the hot ashes where the fire just was. You then scrape some more hot ashes, with a few live coals, onto the top of the disc. If you started with a small "Indian" fire, like I often use, you may want to repeat the cooking procedure, moving the burning wood again and turning the disc over in the process.

The only ingredients are flour and water. You do not add any grease or shortening. That would make dirt stick to the bread. The dry bread is remarkable clean after cooking and shaking the ashes off. A few ashes won't hurt you at all. The bread is kind of a hard cracker, but it's good and it keeps forever.

If you don't have store-bought flour several starchy food plants of the wilderness can be dried thoroughly and pounded with rocks as mortar and pestle into suitable flour. Experiment to minimize adding rock dust to the flour. Biscuitroot was the most available and suitable plant in the High Desert, but the starchy root is only easy to find during the few wet weeks in early spring when carrot type leaves and yellow umbel flowers reveal its location. The rest of the year you have to have sharp eyes and hunt for the tiny and inconspicuous withered seed stalk which will be the only visible remnant of the plant. (Caution--some relatives of this plant are deadly poisonous.)

The ash bread did not form a significant amount of the burro's food at all. I just gave them a little bite, maybe an inch square, and not every day. But that bite made them feel that I loved them--and I did. And I never had any trouble walking right up to them, wherever they were, and putting their halters on.

-----------------------------

Installment ten of:

IN OPPOSITION TO CIVILIZATION

by Andy Van't Hul

When examined from a species extinction point of view, the invention of gunpowder was certainly one of the most damaging and dreadful innovations ever conceived of. The very first time an application of fire caused a mix of chemicals to explode forcefully, the experimenter should have instantly received a sustained shock from a cattle prod to let him know that he had committed a boo-boo and he'd better not play with that stuff anymore. But instead, the exact opposite happened. His buddies all crowded around in fascination at the feat and begged for the recipe. Instead of being punished for the great crime of causing the future extinction of many species, the inventor received a massive pleasure hit of happybrain that most certainly encouraged him to try to invent ever more powerful explosive mixtures.

First, we decimated all of our prey species with our hi-tech weapons. Even Stone Age bows and arrows exterminated many species. Then we switched to farming with the clear cutting of vast forests and the building of huge dams that disrupted river ecologies. Our agriculture system is a total disaster now with extreme soil erosion, trace element deletion, chemical poisoning, desertification etc. I could write another thick book just on that subject. In order to really comprehend how seriously in trouble civilized humans are today, it is important to realize the damage agriculture has caused and is continuing to cause every day to the total life support capacity of earth.

In my analogy comparing Earth Entity to a human body I say that humans are wildly proliferating cancer cells sickening EE. A cancer in a human body does not cause damage only by the sheer number of cancer cells. The cancer also causes tissue breakdown and toxins to develop. Agriculture, the cancer affecting EE, is massively doing the same thing to EE, to Mother Nature.

The erosion of topsoil is obvious and atrocious, but the trace element deletion may be just as bad, and it is not visible--until you see the end effects such as the mindless cretins and the women with huge goiters on their necks. Those symptoms, common in China and the Philippines, are the result of farming-caused iodine deficiency in the soil. Crops suck trace elements out of the soil, and those trace elements, locked in the grain kernels or etc. are then shipped great distances to a city or an animal feedlot where the grain is fed to a hog or a person. Nearly all of those transported trace elements end up in feces which then never leave the locality of that city or feedlot. Those trace elements are no longer available to the food chain--but they are tremendously important for good health--and they took literally millions of years to accumulate, by gradual decomposition of minerals, in the soil. Back during the millions of years we lived as hunter-gatherers we never displaced those trace elements. They were always carefully hoarded by Mother Nature and recycled from life to life right in their original locality. We have no way of measuring the damage we are now doing to the soil, to flowerpot earth, with agriculture--we just know that it is immense. In previous writings I have spent some space and time on the damage agriculture is causing to the environment--but like I said above, the subject is so extensive that it demands its own book, or several volumes, and those books are already published and available in any extensive library. To keep this essay from becoming too rambling I will not try to reproduce the bulk of that material here.

To be continued.

This is a work in progress.

Comments are welcome

(but they may not be posted or replied to immediately)